Introduction
Fabry disease (FD) is a recessive X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by the deficient activity of α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) enzyme as a result of mutations in the GLA gene. The enzyme deficiency results in the progressive accumulation of glycolipids, specifically globotriaosylceramide (GL-3) and its derivatives such as globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-GL3), in the vascular endothelium and other tissues. This leads to damage in multiple organs, including kidneys, heart, and cerebrovascular system, and ultimately, premature death.
It is difficult to recognize patients with FD due to its rarity and nonspecific symptoms. Certain treatment strategies, such as enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), can attenuate the disease progression of FD. Hence, it is crucial to screen high-risk populations, such as patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Screening of families of patients with FD provides an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment of FD. The European Renal Best Practice group has recommended FD screening for CKD patients with an unknown etiology [
1]. Several screening studies have been performed outside of Korea, with the majority of patients being either male or on dialysis. Additionally, most of the studies have screened FD only via an α-Gal A enzyme test, even though plasma lyso-GL3 has been considered a more useful biomarker. There also have been a few screening studies in Korea, but those were performed in cardiology patients or used serum GL-3 in patients treated on dialysis [
2–
4]. Therefore, this is the first study in Korea that evaluated the prevalence of FD in adult patients with CKD including those on renal replacement therapy (RRT) by means of two screening tests, α-Gal A enzyme activity and level of lyso-GL3. In addition, the study included both male and female patients, as well as patients with CKD.
Discussion
During the study period, 897 patients were screened. One patient was identified with FD, exhibiting a 0.11% prevalence of FD in the CKD population in South Korea. To the best of our knowledge, three screening studies for the prevalence of FD have been conducted in Korea so far [
2–
4]. One of them screened 480 patients on dialysis using serum GL-3 but did not observe any patient with FD. The other two studies included patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Regarding Fabry nephropathy, most screening studies have been performed outside of Korea, and most of them included male patients or patients who were on dialysis. Doheny et al. [
9] reanalyzed the prevalence results of previous screening studies conducted between 1995 and 2017 with regard to pathogenicity of
GLA gene mutation. The results reported that the prevalence of FD was 0.21% and 0.15% for male and female patients, respectively, on hemodialysis, and 0.25% and 0% for male and female patients, respectively, who received renal transplants [
9]. Also, a screening study that involved 1,453 CKD patients (not on dialysis) was performed in Turkey, which reported the prevalence of FD as 0.2% (0.4% in male, 0% in female) [
10]. Although male and female patients were recruited to the present study in a nonselective way including both CKD patients with and without dialysis, the prevalence rate was similar to previous reports, albeit slightly low [
9,
10]. Difference in estimated prevalence rates could be attributed to the selection of study population, screening methods used, and the choice of cutoff values [
11].
Renal involvement in FD often begins with hyperfiltration followed by proteinuria and a decline in the glomerular filtration rate, ultimately leading to end-stage renal disease and a decreased life expectancy [
5,
6]. The age at which ERT is initiated is an important factor related to progressive loss of kidney function; additionally, screening is essential for early diagnosis [
12–
14]. The European Renal Best Practice Group recommends screening for FD in male patients below 50 years old and in female patients of any age with unexplained CKD [
1]. However, after the introduction of dialysis and renal transplantation, the average age at death was reported to be 50 to 57 years in male patients and 64 to 72 years in female patients [
15]. Therefore, the present study recruited male CKD patients aged ≤60 years to encompass possible undiagnosed FD patients. Renal manifestations are nonspecific, and the progression of CKD in Fabry nephropathy resembles that of diabetic nephropathy [
11]. Hypertension and DM, the most common causes of CKD, are also frequent in patients with FD [
16]. Multiple symptoms of DM may overlap with those of FD, thus making the diagnosis more difficult. Moreover, FD can be diagnosed in patients with diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy. Patients with dual pathology are observed, although it is rare [
10,
17]. The present study did not assess the prevalence of hypertension and DM, and patients with known diabetic nephropathy were excluded as decided by the responsible physician. This might have affected the prevalence rate of FD in the CKD population observed in this study.
This study identified only one female patient with FD. The low prevalence might be caused by the presence of 55% female patients in the study population. Because the values of α-Gal A enzyme activity in heterozygous female patients are divergent, and up to one-third showed an enzyme activity within the normal range due to a random X-chromosome inactivation [
10,
18]. Similarly, clinical symptoms in female patients are more diverse, from asymptomatic to severe, often at a later age in comparison to the symptoms observed in male patients, which are related to residual enzyme activity. Therefore,
GLA gene mutation analysis is suggested as a primary screening tool in female patients, whereas enzyme activity measurement is recommended in male patients [
1]. The latter method has been primarily used in the majority of screening studies partly due to its convenience and cost-effectiveness, in addition to avoiding unnecessary gene analysis [
10]; nevertheless, gene mutation test is essential to diagnose FD, even though it is not always an ideal approach. Nearly 1,000
GLA gene mutations have been reported, and there are many gene variants of unknown significance (GVUS) [
19]. For individuals with a GVUS of
GLA gene, enzyme activity, plasma lyso-GL3, and/or evidence of GL-3 accumulation in an affected organ need to be studied, as they can help in the diagnosis of FD. Earlier studies have indicated the availability of reliable biomarkers for FD that can identify candidates for gene analysis more easily [
20–
25]. This study measured the α-Gal A enzyme activity using DBS in male patients, which is convenient and less expensive, and has a nearly 100% negative predictive value in male patients [
1,
26,
27]. However, it used whole blood (leukocyte) in female patients, the gold standard for measuring the enzyme activity, because of a higher false-negative value with using DBS compared to using leukocytes in females [
18]. The plasma lyso-GL3 was also measured in all patients, regardless of the results of enzyme activity.
Interestingly, no patient showed concurrent abnormal results in terms of both α-Gal A enzyme activity and plasma lyso-GL3. However, FD was diagnosed only in a patient with elevated plasma lyso-GL3. This result is in line with a previous study [
20] where the investigators measured plasma lyso-GL3 concentration and plasma α-Gal A enzyme activity for screening of FD and identified 13 patients with FD (seven male and six female patients) out of 2,360 screened patients. Likewise, all patients with FD were detected in the group with elevated plasma lyso-GL3 [
20]. Of note, a female patient with FD with elevated plasma lyso-GL3 displayed a normal α-Gal A enzyme activity. Nonpathogenic mutations or GVUS were found in patients with a low α-Gal A enzyme activity and normal plasma lyso-GL3. Although not all patients were genotyped and there were differences in the cutoff values and the method of α-Gal A enzyme measured [
20], the results were similar to those obtained in the present study. In this study, a nucleotide substitution at c.-10C>T was also identified in two female patients with a low α-Gal A enzyme activity and normal plasma lyso-GL3, which is considered as a benign germline variant (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/RCV000335296/). This mutation was in exon 1 of the 5’ untranslated region upstream of the coding sequence and this region is often involved in the regulation of protein translation. This variant was classified as benign as per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. However, to determine its clinical significance, additional test like complex intronic haplotype (c.-10C>T, c.369+990C>A, c.370-81_370-77delCAGCC, c.640-16A>G, c.1000-22C>T) needs to be done. Routine
GLA gene analysis which examines exons and flanking introns cannot detect a deep intronic mutation, although pseudoexon-activating mutations are often located deep in the introns [
28,
29].
In addition, the study by Maruyama et al. [
20] evaluated patients screened positive for lyso-GL3 and having normal α-Gal A enzyme activity and a negative result in the gene test, and lamellar bodies were found in kidney or endomyocardial biopsies. Similarly, in our study, kidney biopsy from a female patient with elevated plasma lyso-GL3 (3.57 ng/mL) and negative gene test (
Table 2) exhibited signs of FD with a large amount of laminated electron-dense bodies observed in the podocyte cytoplasm. She had eGFR of 81.8 mL/min/1.73 m
2 and proteinuria (PCR) of 990 and 830 mg/g. Her ECG showed a right bundle branch block and blood pressure was 109/75 mmHg at the time of inclusion. She did not present FD-related symptoms and there was no information about her medication history. However, it is suggested that this patient needs to be closely monitored for disease progression and the possible diagnosis of FD in due course of time.
Plasma lyso-GL3 analysis has been shown to be a more sensitive and specific test than α-Gal A enzyme activity assays for the diagnosis of FD, especially in heterozygous female patients [
20–
24]. Plasma lyso-GL3 is also suggested as a useful biomarker for therapeutic monitoring [
30]. However, it has been proved that the values of lyso-GL3 increase with age in female patients, and the normal levels of lyso-GL3 cannot confirm the absence of FD. Recently, Baydakova et al. [
25] suggested the α-Gal A/lyso-GL3 ratio as a novel biochemical criterion to increase sensitivity for diagnosis of FD in female patients. Although evaluating the role of plasma lyso-GL3 is out of the scope of this study, the results support the view that the measurement of both α-Gal A enzyme activity and lyso-GL3 helps to improve the screening ability for the diagnosis of FD.
There are a few limitations in the present study. First, the sample size is moderate, and the proportion of RRT in screened patients is not representative of CKD patients in South Korea. Second, not all participants have undergone gene analysis, which leaves the possibility of missing unrecognized FD patients. Third, α-Gal A enzyme activity or plasma lyso-GL3 can remain within normal range in female patients with FD. However, in this study, a dual-screening method was used involving both α-Gal A enzyme activity and lyso-GL3, which makes it less likely to overlook adult female patients with FD. Fourth, as only two institutions reported FD-related symptoms, there are limitations to interpreting the data. Fifth, since patients considered to have typical diabetic nephropathy were excluded on the discretion of the responsible physician, there is a possibility that patients who have both diabetes and FD might be excluded.
In the present study, the prevalence of FD in CKD patients via screening tests was low (0.11%); however, identification of one patient provides an opportunity for early treatment to patient’s relatives. We also determined that both α-Gal A enzyme activity and plasma lyso-GL3 concentration tests are needed to identify patients who are eligible for gene analysis. Further studies are required to examine the relationship between plasma lyso-GL3 concentration and the GLA gene mutation. In patients with CKD of unknown etiology, clinicians should consider FD as a differential diagnosis.