Geographic disparities in kidney function decline: a matched cohort analysis of urban and rural populations in Korea

Article information

Korean J Nephrol. 2025;.j.krcp.25.171
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 December 24
doi : https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.25.171
Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: Ji Eun Kim Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea. E-mail: beeswaxag@korea.ac.kr
Received 2024 June 4; Revised 2025 August 6; Accepted 2025 August 22.

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown differing chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence between rural and urban populations; data on longitudinal renal function decline remain limited. We compared kidney function deterioration rates between rural and urban residents in Korea.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), including 60,487 urban and 14,776 rural participants. Individuals with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² and proteinuria <1+ were included. Using multiple imputation and propensity score matching (1:1 by age, sex, baseline eGFR, and proteinuria), we compared the risk of rapid progression—defined as an annual eGFR decline >5 mL/min/1.73 m²—between urban and rural residents. Logistic regression and mediation analyses were conducted across five imputed matched datasets.

Results

Among 14,336 matched urban and rural participants, rapid progression occurred in 1.9% and 9.1%, respectively. Rural residency was independently associated with significantly higher odds of rapid progression, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 5.42 (95% confidence interval, 4.61–6.37) in the fully adjusted model. Mediation analysis identified serum albumin, educational attainment, and dietary protein intake as key mediators (total indirect effect OR, 1.12; p < 0.001), although a significant direct effect of rural residence remained.

Conclusion

Rural residency was associated with a substantially elevated risk of rapid progression, mediated in part by nutritional and socioeconomic disparities. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to mitigate kidney health inequities in underserved regions.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a major global public health concern, and identifying modifiable risk factors for CKD progression is essential for prevention and early intervention [1]. Although traditional clinical predictors such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension are well established, increasing attention has been directed toward structural and environmental factors, including geographic residence, that may influence long-term renal outcomes [13].

In South Korea, the population distribution has become increasingly concentrated in urban areas, whereas rural regions are facing continuous depopulation and demographic aging. Despite occupying a substantial portion of the national territory, rural areas are often characterized by lower healthcare service density, reduced access to specialists, and longer travel times to medical facilities [46]. However, the potential link between these structural disparities and decline in renal function has not been fully elucidated in population-based studies.

In this study, we investigated whether place of residence is associated with the risk of a rapid decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using cohort data that included both urban and rural populations in Korea.

Methods

Ethics considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Korea University Guro Hospital (No. 2020GR0151) and complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the IRB, given the use of publicly available, de-identified data.

Study setting and participants

This study was based on urban and rural cohorts from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). Urban participants were health screening examinees recruited from medical centers located in major cities and medium-sized urban areas, including Seoul, Busan, Incheon, Daegu, Gwangju, Ulsan, Anyang, Goyang, Seongnam, Chuncheon, Cheonan, Gwangju (Jeonnam), Hwasun, and Changwon. Rural participants were residents of farming communities recruited from predefined rural regions, including Yangpyeong (Gyeonggi-do), Goryeong (Gyeongsangbuk-do), Namwon (Jeollanam-do), Wonju and Pyeongchang (Gangwon-do), and Ganghwa (Incheon). Participants with at least one follow-up eGFR measurement were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: missing baseline eGFR values; baseline eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²; and proteinuria ≥1+ on dipstick analysis. After exclusion, 60,487 and 14,776 participants from the urban and rural cohorts, respectively, were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). For comparison, a 1:1 propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, baseline eGFR, and dipstick proteinuria.

Figure 1.

Participant selection flowchart for the urban and rural cohorts.

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

To calculate the annual eGFR decline rate, we used the difference between baseline and the earliest available follow-up eGFR measurement divided by the time interval in years. In the urban cohort, eGFR measurements at baseline (2004–2013) and first follow-up (2012–2016) were used. In the rural cohort, eGFR values from baseline (2005–2011) and the first available follow-up among up to four follow-up visits (2007–2016) were used.

Study outcome

The primary outcome was rapid eGFR decline, defined as an annual decline in eGFR of >5 mL/min/1.73 m² based on the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline [7]. The eGFR was estimated using the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation [8].

Data collection and processing

Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from all the participants. The variables included age, sex, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and dyslipidemia), nutritional status based on food frequency questionnaires, and laboratory parameters such as albumin level. Variables with >10% missing values (e.g., cancer history, income, smoking status, calcium, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and glycated hemoglobin) were excluded from the analysis. For the remaining variables with missing values below 10%, multiple imputation using chained equations was performed to reduce potential bias and improve robustness. This process generated five imputed datasets, each of which was subsequently used in downstream propensity score matching and analysis.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics are summarized as number (%) for categorical variables and as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Comparisons between the baseline characteristics of the groups were conducted using the t-test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. To ensure comparability between cohorts, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using the matchit function from the R MatchIt package, based on age, sex, baseline eGFR, and dipstick proteinuria, with a caliper of 0.1. This matching process was conducted separately within each of the five imputed datasets generated during data preprocessing. To evaluate the association between geographic residency and the risk of rapid eGFR progression, logistic regression models were applied across the five matched datasets. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for the unadjusted, backward selection, and fully adjusted models using Rubin’s rules. Mediation analysis was performed using structural equation modeling with the lavaan package in R. Given the inclusion of both categorical (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, education levels) and continuous mediators (serum albumin, eGFR, dietary protein and sodium intake), the analysis employed a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator, which is appropriate for models involving categorical dependent variables. Binary exposure (rural vs. urban residence) and binary outcome (rapid progression) were modeled with a logit link. The indirect and direct effects were estimated separately for each imputed and propensity-matched dataset, and the results were pooled using Rubin’s rules. All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing), and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of age, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate-matched urban and rural cohort

A total of 60,487 and 14,776 eligible participants were identified in the urban and rural cohorts, respectively. The baseline characteristics of all the participants before matching are shown in Supplementary Table 1 (available online). Variables with >10% missing data were excluded, and the remaining variables were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations, resulting in five imputed datasets. In each dataset, 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted based on age, sex, baseline eGFR, and dipstick proteinuria. As a result, 14,336 matched participants remained in each of the urban and rural cohorts.

All five matched datasets showed consistent distributions. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics from one representative dataset. After matching, the mean eGFR was well-balanced between the two groups (81.1 ± 10.7 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 81.6 ± 10.3 mL/min/1.73 m²). However, small residual differences in age (57.3 ± 7.9 years vs. 58.2 ± 9.1 years), male sex (44.8% vs. 38.9%), and trace proteinuria (7.5% vs. 8.3%) remained.

Baseline characteristics of the propensity score–matched urban and rural cohorts

The urban cohort had a higher prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia compared to the rural cohort, whereas the rural cohort had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events. According to the food frequency questionnaire, a higher proportion of the urban cohort followed a low-sodium diet (Na <2 g/day), while in the rural cohort, more than 50% of participants reported adhering to a low-protein diet.

Prevalence and risk of rapid estimated glomerular filtration rate decline according to geographic residency

During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range, 2.2–4.2 years), the prevalence of rapid progressors—defined as an eGFR decline exceeding 5 mL/min/1.73 m² per year—was 279 (1.9%) in the urban cohort and 1,305 (9.1%) in the rural cohort, respectively. Pooled logistic regression analysis across the five imputed and matched datasets was conducted to assess the effect of residential area on rapid progression. In the unadjusted, backward selection, and fully adjusted models, rural residency was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.0 (95% CI, 4.42–5.76), 8.0 (95% CI, 7.17–9.00), and 5.4 (95% CI, 4.61–6.37) for rapid progression compared to urban residency, respectively. Fig. 2 presents the significant risk factors for rapid progression. Rural residency exhibited the highest OR, even when compared to diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular events.

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing the adjusted ORs for rapid eGFR decline in the matched urban and rural cohort.

Forest plot displaying odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for variables associated with rapid eGFR decline. Each black dot indicates the OR and whiskers represent the 95% CI. The x-axis is shown on a log scale.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HTN, hypertension.

Mediation analysis for evaluating direct and indirect effects of residency area on rapid estimated glomerular filtration rate decline

Regarding the significant increase in risk for rapid eGFR decline by residential area, we hypothesized that this association might be partially mediated by differences in clinical or socioeconomic factors rather than entirely attributable to a direct effect of residency itself. To explore this, we performed a mediation analysis using serum albumin level, educational attainment, dietary protein intake, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease as potential mediators of the relationship between rural residency and rapid progression (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Forest plot of direct and indirect effects of rural residence on rapid eGFR decline.

Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals are shown for the direct effect and eight parallel mediators, including eGFR, comorbidities, nutritional status, and dietary factors. Effects were estimated using structural equation modeling with a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator and pooled across five imputed matched datasets. The dashed line indicates OR = 1.

CVA, cerebrovascular accident; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

The pooled OR for the total indirect effect was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.07–1.16; p < 0.001), indicating a significant contribution from the mediators. Among them, lower serum albumin showed the strongest mediating effect (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06–1.09; p < 0.001), followed by lower educational attainment (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; p = 0.003) and low dietary protein intake (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; p = 0.001). Nonetheless, a significant direct effect of rural residency remained after adjusting for these mediators, suggesting that additional, unmeasured factors such as environmental exposures, healthcare accessibility, or behavioral patterns may also play a role in the observed geographic disparity.

Discussion

In this study, we observed substantial geographic disparities in the risk of rapid eGFR decline among urban, rural, and emigrant populations. Specifically, individuals residing in rural areas of Korea exhibited a significantly higher risk of rapid kidney function decline than their urban counterparts, even after adjusting for age, sex, baseline kidney function, and proteinuria. These findings suggest that rural residency may independently contribute to accelerated renal deterioration, potentially due to unmeasured confounders, including reduced healthcare access, environmental stressors, or socioeconomic disadvantages.

According to Statistics Korea, approximately 9.2% of the national population resides in non-urban areas [9]. As urbanization continues and regional inequalities intensify, rural populations are increasingly affected by healthcare disparities, including limited service availability and geographic isolation [10,11]. Rural areas in Korea account for only 13% of healthcare institutions nationwide, and the number of private healthcare facilities per million people is 70% of that in urban areas [12]. Additionally, the spatial dispersion of rural residents results in longer travel times to medical facilities [12]. Such systemic limitations are compounded by unfavorable health behaviors and lower socioeconomic status among rural populations, which have been associated with a higher burden of chronic diseases, including CKD [1318].

Our findings are consistent with those of previous international studies highlighting the challenges faced by patients with CKD in rural regions, including financial and logistical barriers to accessing nephrology care, increased caregiving burden, and social isolation. A global review of 18 studies emphasized the disproportionate difficulties encountered by rural residents in accessing CKD care services [19]. Delayed referral to nephrologists and late CKD diagnosis, often due to an asymptomatic disease course, can result in suboptimal outcomes [20]. Evidence indicates that early nephrology referral is critical for slowing CKD progression [21,22], and rural residents may have less access to specialty care, as demonstrated in a previous study [23].

Our mediation analysis provides insight into the mechanisms linking rural residency to rapid kidney function decline. While traditional risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease were included, nutritional status and educational attainment emerged as particularly influential. Specifically, lower serum albumin and reduced dietary protein intake highlighted the contribution of malnutrition and poor diet quality—likely reflecting broader inequities in nutritional access and health literacy. Likewise, lower educational levels may signal limited capacity for disease self-management.

These results suggest that geographic disparities in kidney health are driven not only by medical conditions but also by socioeconomic and behavioral determinants, shaped by systemic barriers in healthcare access and education. Nonetheless, a significant direct effect of rural residency persisted, indicating that additional unmeasured factors such as environmental exposures, healthcare availability, or cultural barriers may also play an important role.

Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive public health approach. Evidence-based strategies such as CKD screening [24] in rural areas and better referral systems [21] can support early diagnosis and access to specialist care. In addition, community programs focused on nutrition and health education may help reduce the impact of poor diet and limited health knowledge. Together, these approaches are key to lowering the burden of CKD and improving kidney health in underserved regions.

This study has several strengths, including the use of a large, well-matched cohort and robust statistical methods to address confounding factors. Importantly, the analysis incorporated a wide range of clinical, dietary, familial, and socioeconomic variables, allowing for comprehensive adjustment for both medical and contextual risk factors. However, some limitations must be acknowledged. First, although matching was performed on key variables including age, sex, eGFR, and proteinuria, some residual imbalance remained, which may have affected the results. Unmeasured confounding factors may also persist due to limitations in the dataset. Second, although rapid eGFR decline was defined according to the 2012 KDIGO guideline as an annual decrease >5 mL/min/1.73 m², in a generally healthy population this may in some cases reflect acute, transient fluctuations or measurement variability rather than true CKD progression. This potential misclassification could attenuate the specificity of the outcome definition and should be considered when interpreting the findings. Third, the mean follow-up duration differed between groups (urban, 4.7 years; rural, 2.8 years), which may have introduced bias in estimating annual eGFR decline. Finally, a follow-up duration of 3.8 years may not be sufficient to fully characterize the long-term trajectory of kidney function, particularly in individuals with slowly progressive disease.

In conclusion, our findings highlighted the critical role of geographic residence in CKD risk stratification. In particular, rural Korean populations appear to be at elevated risk of rapid kidney function decline and may benefit from targeted interventions. Future research should aim to identify specific environmental and healthcare-related contributors to this increased risk and to develop effective preventive strategies tailored to rural settings.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data are available at Kidney Research and Clinical Practice online (https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.25.171).

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This study was supported by the 2022 Young Investigator Research Grant from the Korean Nephrology Research Foundation (grant number: Q2219751).

Data sharing statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), which is managed by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study. Data are available from the National Biobank of Korea upon reasonable request and approval through the official data access process. Further information is available at https://www.kdca.go.kr (Accessed in June 2025).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: JEK, SYA, GJK

Data curation, Methodology, Funding acquisition: JEK

Supervision: EJC, SYA, GJK, YJK

Writing – original draft: JEK

Writing – review & editing: EJC, SYA, GJK, YJK

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Francis A, Harhay MN, Ong ACM, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the global public health agenda: an international consensus. Nat Rev Nephrol 2024;20:473–485. 10.1038/s41581-024-00820-6. 38570631.
2. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1204–1222. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. 33069326.
3. Xie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, et al. Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int 2018;94:567–581. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.011. 30078514.
4. Cho D, Shin J, Kim G, Lee G. An analysis of spatial accessibility to public healthcare services in rural areas. J Korean Assoc Reg Geogr 2010;16:137–153.
5. Kim M, An D, Lim J. Urban-rural gap of healthcare and cultural service accessibility in South Korea. In: Batabyal AA, Higano Y, Nijkamp P, eds. Rural–urban dichotomies and spatial development in Asia. Springer Singapore; 2021. p. 91-126.
6. Yi YJ, Kim EJ. The effects of accessibility to medical facilities and public transportation on perceived health of urban and rural elderly: using generalized ordered logit model. J Korean Reg Dev Assoc 2015;27:65–88.
7. Levin A, Stevens PE. Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney Int 2014;85:49–61. 10.1038/ki.2013.444. 24284513.
8. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1737–1749. 10.1056/nejmoa2102953. 34554658.
9. Shin WR. Urban growth imbalance: local cities are disappearing–20 years of urban change in Korea based on the Population and Housing Census. KOSTAT Statistics Plus [Internet]. Statistics Korea; 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 4]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a90102010100&bid=11918&act=view&list_no=419007.
10. Yoon TH, Kim JH. Health inequalities between rural and urban areas in South Korea. J Korean Acad Rural Health Nurs 2006;1:11–20.
11. Jang IY, Jung HW, Lee CK, et al. Rural and urban disparities in frailty and aging-related health conditions in Korea. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:908–911. 10.1111/jgs.14074. 27100601.
12. Cho SN, Na H. Estimation of rural residents’ perception and demand for home medical visits, and willingness to pay for services. GRI Review 2024;26:251–270.
13. Chung SJ, Han YS, Lee SI, Kang SH. Urban and rural differences in the prevalence of gender and age specific obesity and related health behaviors in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:713–720. 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.5.713. 16224141.
14. Ha K, Song Y, Kim HK. Regional disparities in the associations of cardiometabolic risk factors and healthy dietary factors in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2020;14:519–531. 10.4162/nrp.2020.14.5.519. 33029291.
15. Matthews KA, Croft JB, Liu Y, et al. Health-related behaviors by urban-rural county classification: United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66:1–8. 10.15585/mmwr.ss6605a1.
16. Cohen SA, Greaney ML, Sabik NJ. Assessment of dietary patterns, physical activity and obesity from a national survey: rural-urban health disparities in older adults. PLoS One 2018;13e0208268. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208268. 30517166.
17. Foster HM, Polz P, Gill JM, Celis-Morales C, Mair FS, O’Donnell CA. The influence of socioeconomic status on the association between unhealthy lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review. Wellcome Open Res 2023;8:55. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18708.1. 38533439.
18. Chang I, Kim BH. Regional disparity of medical resources and its effect on age-standardized mortality rates in Korea. Ann Reg Sci 2019;62:305–325. 10.1007/s00168-019-00897-z.
19. Scholes-Robertson NJ, Howell M, Gutman T, et al. Patients’ and caregivers’ perspectives on access to kidney replacement therapy in rural communities: systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2020;10e037529. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037529. 32967878.
20. Bello AK, Peters J, Rigby J, Rahman AA, El Nahas M. Socioeconomic status and chronic kidney disease at presentation to a renal service in the United Kingdom. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1316–1323. 10.2215/cjn.00680208. 18579673.
21. Smart NA, Dieberg G, Ladhani M, Titus T. Early referral to specialist nephrology services for preventing the progression to end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(6):CD007333. 10.1002/14651858.cd007333.pub2.
22. Smart NA, Titus TT. Outcomes of early versus late nephrology referral in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 2011;124:1073–1080. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.026. 22017785.
23. Bello AK, Ronksley PE, Tangri N, et al. Prevalence and demographics of CKD in Canadian primary care practices: a cross-sectional study. Kidney Int Rep 2019;4:561–570. 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.01.005. 30993231.
24. Narva AS, Briggs M. The National Kidney Disease Education Program: improving understanding, detection, and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53:S115–S120. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.038. 19231755.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Participant selection flowchart for the urban and rural cohorts.

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing the adjusted ORs for rapid eGFR decline in the matched urban and rural cohort.

Forest plot displaying odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for variables associated with rapid eGFR decline. Each black dot indicates the OR and whiskers represent the 95% CI. The x-axis is shown on a log scale.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HTN, hypertension.

Figure 3.

Forest plot of direct and indirect effects of rural residence on rapid eGFR decline.

Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals are shown for the direct effect and eight parallel mediators, including eGFR, comorbidities, nutritional status, and dietary factors. Effects were estimated using structural equation modeling with a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator and pooled across five imputed matched datasets. The dashed line indicates OR = 1.

CVA, cerebrovascular accident; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the propensity score–matched urban and rural cohorts

Characteristic Urban Rural p-value
No. of patients 14,336 14,336
Age (yr) 57.3 ± 7.9 58.2 ± 9.1 <0.001
Male sex 6,423 (44.8) 5,573 (38.9) <0.001
HTN 3,859 (26.9) 3,436 (24.0) <0.001
DM 1,162 (8.1) 1,128 (7.9) 0.47
Dyslipidemia 1,809 (12.6) 1,019 (7.1) <0.001
CVA 263 (1.8) 334 (2.3) 0.004
Drinking status <0.001
 Current drinker 6,396 (44.6) 6,127 (42.7)
 Ex-drinker 689 (4.8) 827 (5.8)
 Never 7,251 (50.6) 7,382 (51.5)
Education status <0.001
 No formal education 175 (1.2) 1,694 (11.8)
 Elementary school 2,135 (14.9) 6,221 (43.4)
 Middle school 2,256 (15.7) 2,534 (17.7)
 High school 5,025 (35.1) 2,682 (18.7)
 College or university 3,850 (26.9) 998 (7.0)
 Graduate school 895 (6.2) 207 (1.4)
Family history of HTN 4,423 (30.9) 3,170 (22.1) <0.001
Family history of DM 2,491 (17.4) 1,883 (13.1) <0.001
Height (cm) 161.7 ± 8.1 158.0 ± 8.5 <0.001
Weight (kg) 63.4 ± 9.9 61.2 ± 10.0 <0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 82.3 ± 8.6 84.3 ± 8.7 <0.001
Hip circumference (cm) 94.7 ± 5.7 93.9 ± 6.4 <0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 14.2 ± 1.4 13.8 ± 1.4 <0.001
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 96.1 ± 19.3 97.7 ± 20.6 <0.001
AST (IU/L) 24.2 ± 14.6 26.7 ± 19.6 <0.001
ALT (IU/L) 22.6 ± 14.6 24.6 ± 17.0 <0.001
Albumin (g/dL) 4.6 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.3 <0.001
BUN (mg/dL) 15.6 ± 3.8 15.5 ± 4.1 0.03
Uric acid (mg/dL) 5.1 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 1.3 <0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 198.6 ± 36.3 198.5 ± 36.2 0.66
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 52.4 ± 12.8 45.1 ± 10.9 <0.001
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 130.9 ± 84.3 145.8 ± 94.0 <0.001
Proteinuria (trace) 1,075 (7.5) 1,195 (8.3) <0.001
eGFRa (mL/min/1.73 m2) 81.7 ± 10.7 81.6 ± 10.3 <0.001
Follow-up duration for eGFR (yr) 4.7 ± 1.7 2.8 ± 1.4 <0.001
Low sodium diet (Na <2 g/day) 5,926 (41.3) 5,618 (39.2) <0.001
Low protein diet (protein <0.8 g/kg/day) 5,966 (41.6) 7,472 (52.1) <0.001

Data are expressed as number only, mean ± standard deviation, or number (%).

This table presents baseline characteristics from one of the five imputed datasets after 1:1 propensity score matching. All statistical analyses were performed separately in each imputed dataset and pooled according to Rubin’s rules.

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HTN, hypertension.

a

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine.