Severity of foot process effacement is associated with proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy

Article information

Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2020;39(3):295-304
Publication date (electronic) : 2020 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.20.017
1Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
2Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
3Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
4Institute of Tissue Regeneration, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
5Soonchunhyang Institute of Medi-bio Science, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: Samel Park, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31 Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea. E-mail: samelpark17@schmc.ac.kr

Editor: Jung Eun Lee, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Received 2020 January 28; Revised 2020 June 1; Accepted 2020 June 4.

Abstract

Background

Proteinuria is a significant risk factor for progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and has a positive correlation with severity of foot process effacement (FPE). We evaluated the relationship of FPE with proteinuria and histologic characteristics, including the Oxford classification.

Methods

Patients who underwent renal biopsy and were diagnosed with IgAN at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged less than 18 years and those with the possibility of secondary causes were excluded from the study. Subsequently, we evaluated the association between degree of proteinuria, severity of FPE, and histologic characteristics, including the Oxford classification and other immunofluorescence stains.

Results

A total of 805 cases of renal biopsy was performed at our institution, and 327 patients were diagnosed with IgAN. Among them, 82 patients were excluded. Severity of FPE had an impact on the degree of proteinuria. Notably, the group with diffuse FPE had more than about 1.3 g/day of urine protein compared to those with rare FPE. Among the histologic characteristics, M1 score and immune deposition of IgG affected severity of FPE (hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 1.90 [1.10 to 3.26], and 3.77 [1.66 to 8.54], respectively).

Conclusion

Severity of FPE had an impact on the degree of proteinuria and may be associated with the pathogenesis of IgAN.

Introduction

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the leading cause of primary chronic glomerular disease in the world [1,2]. A slow progression to end-stage renal disease over two decades has been reported in 30% of patients [3]. Diagnosis is based on presence of mesangial proliferation with dominant or co-dominant IgA deposition [4]. The deposition of circulating immune complex, caused by autoantibodies against galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), in glomerular mesangium is considered the emerging pathogenesis of IgAN [5]. The deposited immune complex consisting of Gd-IgA1 and antibody (mostly IgG and partly IgA) leads to podocyte activation and injury through mesangial-derived cytokines [6,7].

Proteinuria has been reported to be the most important risk factor for progression of IgAN [8,9]. Approximately 10% of IgAN present with nephrotic syndrome and exhibit poor prognosis in absence of response to treatment [10]. Another study reports presence of extensive foot process effacement (FPE) in patients with IgAN with nephrotic syndrome, similar to minimal change disease [11]. In addition, proteinuria has a positive correlation with severity of FPE in IgAN [12]. However, the relationship of FPE and proteinuria or with other histologic characteristics, like the Oxford classification, has not been examined. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between FPE, proteinuria, and histologic characteristics, including the Oxford classification.

Methods

Study population

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) (approval number: 2019-08-026-001). Patients who underwent a renal biopsy and were diagnosed with IgAN at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) from January 2011 to December 2018 were evaluated. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with predominant immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy of IgA (≥ 1+) in the glomerular mesangial area were enrolled. Patients with active cancer, positive serology for hepatitis virus antigens (B and C), acute infection, or history of diabetes ± biopsy confirmed diabetic nephropathy were excluded to rule out secondary causes. Patients without electron microscopy results that showed adequate glomerulus to evaluate severity of FPE were excluded. Patients with subendothelial electron-dense depositions were also removed from this study to exclude the interaction between subendothelial deposition and FPE. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Since this was a retrospective study, the requirement of informed consent was waived.

Characteristics of renal pathology

Diagnosis of IgAN was based on light and IF microscopy results by two expert pathologists (J.H. Lee and S.H. Jang). The histologic features were described according to the Oxford classification of mesangial hypercellularity (M, Fig. 1A), endocapillary hypercellularity (E, Fig. 1B), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S), tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T), and crescents (C) [13-15]. Severity of FPE was determined based on only extent of FPE, which was established by visual inspection [16] using a semi-quantitative method. When more than 90% of the capillaries exhibited FPE, we defined the severity as ‘diffuse.’ If less than 10% of the capillaries exhibited FPE, it was designated as ‘rare.’ If FPE was observed in more than half (but not exceeding 90%) of the total glomerular capillary length, it was defined as ‘moderate’; if not (i.e., FPE was observed in less than half of the total glomerular capillary length), it was described as ‘mild’ (Fig. 2). The degree of IgA deposition was categorized as 1+, 2+, and ≥ 3+ (representing 3+ and 4+). Co-deposition of complement 3 (C3) was described as negative, trace, 1+, and ≥ 2+ (representing 2+ and 3+) and of IgG as a dichotomous level, negative or positive. Patients with number of globally sclerotic glomeruli (GSG) greater than the upper reference limit (95th percentile) of those expected on biopsy according to age were grouped into GSG abnormal for age [17]. Patients aged > 77 years were regarded to have the same thresholds as the 75 to 77-years group because reference limits were not available for patients aged > 77 years. Patients not assigned to the GSG abnormal group for age were grouped with GSG normal for age.

Figure 1

Representative histology by light microscopy of glomeruli with (A) mesangial hypercellularity and (B) endocapillary hypercellularity.

Black bar represents 50 μm; black arrowheads, mesangial hypercellularity; black arrows, endocapillary hypercellularity.

Figure 2

Representative images of electron microscopy of (A) rare, (B) mild, (C) moderate, and (D) diffuse foot process effacement.

White bar represents 5 μm in (A), (B), and (C) but 10 μm in (D). Black arrows represent lesion with foot process effacement.

Covariates

The clinical and demographical characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension, current smoking status, and blood pressure on admission day, were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. The patients’ laboratory data, including complete blood count, serum protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, calcium, and phosphorus, were collected. Based on creatinine level, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation [18]. Twenty-four-hour collected urine protein and urine protein to creatinine ratio were calculated.

Statistical analyses

The patients were categorized into four groups according to severity of FPE: 1) rare, 2) mild, 3) moderate, and 4) diffuse. Categorical variables are presented as count (percentage) and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed continuous variables. For categorical variables, Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was performed. As a trend test, the Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used for continuous variables. For categorical variables, the Cochran-Armitage test was used in the case of 2 × k tables, while the linear-by-linear association test was used in other cases. To estimate the role of covariates in degree of proteinuria, generalized linear models were used. The basic model was created based on clinical information that was classically considered significant, including the Oxford classification. Then, a new model including severity of FPE was built to demonstrate the association between FPE and proteinuria. The impacts of the histologic characteristics on FPE were evaluated using ordinary logistic analysis because the parallelism test for ordinary logistic analysis was satisfied.

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R version 3.4.3 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

A total of 805 cases of renal biopsy was performed at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) from January 2011 to December 2018. Among them, 327 patients were diagnosed with IgAN. Overall, 82 patients were excluded from this study with the following causes: 8, inadequate glomerulus in electron microscopy; 22, age < 18 years (range: 10 to 17 years); 7, active cancer (1, cholangiocarcinoma; 1, gastric cancer; 2, gynecologic cancer; 1, thyroid cancer; 1, breast cancer; and 1, hepatocellular carcinoma); 15, hepatitis B antigen positive; 1, hepatitis C antigen positive; 1, suspicion of infection-associated IgAN; and 19, diabetes ± concomitant diabetic nephropathy. To eliminate the interaction between subendothelial deposition and FPE, nine patients with subendothelial deposits were excluded. Finally, a total of 245 patients was analyzed.

Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics stratified according to severity of FPE. In patients with severe FPE, more urine protein, higher serum uric acid level, and lower serum albumin level were noted. Reduced renal function with higher T score in the Oxford classification was observed in the higher FPE group. Calcium level seemed to be lower in the more severe FPE group. However, there was no difference in corrected calcium level between the groups, implying an effect of serum albumin level. Additionally, the group with severe FPE had a more prevalent M1 score in the Oxford classification, a higher proportion of GSG abnormal for age, and greater deposition of IgG (Table 1, Fig. 3).

Clinical characteristics of patients with IgA nephropathy stratified according to foot process effacement (n = 245)

Figure 3

Characteristics of renal histology according to stratification of severity of foot process effacement.

Represented based on (A-C) immunofluorescence stain, (A) IgA, (B) IgG, (C), C3, and (D) globally sclerotic glomeruli (GSG) abnormal or normal for age. The numbers in the graph indicate the numbers of patients. Statistical significance in trend test; aP < 0.01; bP < 0.05.

We evaluated the possible factors with an impact on degree of proteinuria. All scores of the Oxford classification exhibited a relationship with proteinuria (Fig. 4). Model 1 was built with variables that were classically considered significant, including age, male sex, history of hypertension, current smoking status, BMI, mean arterial pressure, eGFR, uric acid, and the Oxford classification (Table 2). The score of E1 was associated with more severe proteinuria (about 0.5 g/day more than E0). When severity of FPE was added to Model 1 (i.e., Model 2), it exerted an effect on proteinuria independently. Notably, patients with diffuse FPE had more than 1.30 g/day (0.63 to 1.96 g/day) of proteinuria compared to those with rare FPE, suggesting the significant role of FPE in proteinuria in patients with IgAN (Table 2). The histologic characteristics in correlation with severity of FPE were evaluated. As a result, severity of FPE was found to be associated with M1 in the Oxford classification and with deposition of IgG in IF (Table 3).

Figure 4

Degree of proteinuria based on the Oxford classification.

(A) Mesangial hypercellularity, M; (B) endocapillary hypercellularity, E; (C) segmental glomerulosclerosis, S; (D) tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, T; and (E) crescents, C. Presented as median and interquartile range; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

The clinical and histologic characteristics associated with level of urine protein (g/day)

The histologic characteristics associated with severity of foot process effacement

Discussion

Our results showed that severity of FPE had an impact on degree of proteinuria, and that mesangial proliferation and immune deposits of IgG were associated with severity of FPE. Considering the changes in actin dynamics induced by cytoskeleton rearrangements in podocyte, a connection between FPE and proteinuria was conceivable [19]. Our results suggest that mesangial proliferation and deposition of IgG are linked with FPE of podocytes in IgAN.

In our cohort, all the Oxford classification scores exhibited a statistically significant relationship with proteinuria (Fig. 4). However, there were several discrepancies in the association between the Oxford classification and degree of proteinuria [20-22]. The discrepancies noted in previous studies may be attributed to severity of FPE.

In our final model, E1 in the Oxford classification and severity of FPE were associated with proteinuria (Table 2). Chakera et al [23] reported that E-lesions with no immunosuppressive treatment exhibited prognostic value. E score and degree of proteinuria were significantly related. However, there was no improvement of the goodness of fit when an interaction term between E-score and proteinuria was added [23]. Another study from China reported that crescents were more prevalent with E1 score [24]. Our result was consistent with this previous study. Their subsequent study showed that CD68 infiltrates were associated with E score, suggesting that the pathogenesis of more severe proteinuria in patients with E score was correlated with renal inflammation [25]. They also reported a significant association between E and C scores. In our cohort, a similar relationship between E and C scores was observed (Fig. 5A). Patients with E1 had more proteinuria than those with E0 irrespective of C score (Fig. 5B). Given that formation of crescents represented a nonspecific response to severe injury to the glomerular capillary wall and discontinuities of capillary walls resulting in leakage of inflammatory materials into Bowman’s space [26,27], endocapillary hypercellularity may precede crescent formation.

Figure 5

The association of endocapillary hypercellularity and crescents and their implications on proteinuria.

(A) Crescents are more prevalent in endocapillary hypercellularity, P < 0.001 by Pearson’s chi-square test. (B) The amount of proteinuria is larger in endocapillary hypercellularity, irrespective of crescents. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

C, crescents; E, endocapillary hypercellularity.

Deposition of immune complexes composed of Gd-IgA1 and its specific autoantibodies in the mesangial area have a pivotal role in pathogenesis of IgAN [28]. Deposition of immune complexes in the mesangial area leads to proliferation of mesangial cells, thereby affecting other cells in the nephron, i.e., podocytes and tubular epithelial cells [29]. Podocyte injury results in podocyte detachment, podocyte hypertrophy, and FPE [30]. Previous studies have shown that podocytopathy induced by podocyte loss correlated with disease severity in IgAN [31], leading to segmental sclerosis and disease progression [32,33]. Given that mesangial proliferation leads to podocyte injury in IgAN [6,7], it was conceivable that mesangial hypercellularity was associated with severity of FPE, as shown in our results (Table 3).

Additionally, our study showed that patients with positive IgG deposits in IF have greater FPEs (Fig. 3, Table 3). Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with IgG deposition exhibited more detrimental renal outcomes [34-36]. Since there were several cases in which IgG deposits were not found in IF microscopy, it was considered that IgA autoantibodies specific to Gd-IgA1 were generated [37]. However, in a recent study, Gd-IgA1-specific IgG autoantibodies were found even in patients with negative IgG by IF microscopy [38]. The antigenicity in IF could be masked by sampling errors that could occur during renal biopsy and by the three-dimensional structure of the glomeruli. Nonetheless, if any patient had numerous lesions with co-deposition of IgG in their glomeruli, those with positive IgG could be identified more easily in renal biopsy samples. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that the more common is IgG deposition the more severe is the disease. Taken together, our results implied that IgG deposition induced podocyte injury and FPE.

Our study had several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study from a single center. Additionally, all patients involved in this study were Korean. Therefore, it may be problematic to apply our results to other races. Second, the severity of FPE was determined by visual inspection in a semi-quantitative fashion. Third, the proportion of IgG deposits in our cohort was smaller (28 cases, 10.4%) compared to previous reports [34-36]. These results might be affected by a regional determinant of renal biopsies, such as medical insurance or tests for mandatory military service. Nevertheless, another study on deposition of IgG in Korea reported that 31.9% of cases had IgG deposition in the glomerulus [35]. This discrepancy could be a weakness of our study.

In conclusion, our results suggest that severity of FPE had an impact on degree of proteinuria and may be associated with pathogenesis of IgAN.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant (NRF-2019R1G1 A1099728) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea and a grant (No. 2019M3E5D1A02069071) from the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT). This study was also supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Authors’ contributions

Ji-Hye Lee and Si-Hyong Jang reviewed biopsies. Nam-Jun Cho, Nam Hun Heo, and Samel Park collected data and performed statistical analysis. Ji-Hye Lee and Samel Park conceptualized this study and drafted the manuscript. Hyo-Wook Gil, Eun Young Lee, and Jong-Seok Moon advised on the study.

References

1. Wyatt RJ, Julian BA. 2013;IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med 368:2402–2414. 10.1056/NEJMra1206793. 23782179.
2. Tomino Y. 2016;Diagnosis and treatment of patients with IgA nephropathy in Japan. Kidney Res Clin Pract 35:197–203. 10.1016/j.krcp.2016.09.001. 27957413.
3. D'Amico G. 2004;Natural history of idiopathic IgA nephropathy and factors predictive of disease outcome. Semin Nephrol 24:179–196. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2004.01.001. 15156525.
4. Roberts IS. 2014;Pathology of IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 10:445–454. 10.1038/nrneph.2014.92. 24861083.
5. Robert T, Berthelot L, Cambier A, Rondeau E, Monteiro RC. 2015;Molecular insights into the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Trends Mol Med 21:762–775. 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.10.003. 26614735. PMC7343866.
6. Lai KN, Leung JC, Chan LY, et al. 2008;Activation of podocytes by mesangial-derived TNF-alpha: glomerulo-podocytic communication in IgA nephropathy. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294:F945–F955. 10.1152/ajprenal.00423.2007. 18256312. PMC7101871.
7. Lai KN, Leung JC, Chan LY, et al. 2009;Podocyte injury induced by mesangial-derived cytokines in IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:62–72. 10.1093/ndt/gfn441. 18685143. PMC6586273.
8. Radford MG Jr, Donadio JV Jr, Bergstralh EJ, Grande JP. 1997;Predicting renal outcome in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:199–207.
9. Reich HN, Troyanov S, Scholey JW, Cattran DC. Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry. 2007;Remission of proteinuria improves prognosis in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 18:3177–3183. 10.1681/ASN.2007050526. 17978307.
10. Kim JK, Kim JH, Lee SC, et al. 2012;Clinical features and outcomes of IgA nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:427–436. 10.2215/CJN.04820511. 22223610. PMC3302681.
11. Herlitz LC, Bomback AS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, D'Agati VD, Markowitz GS. 2014;IgA nephropathy with minimal change disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1033–1039. 10.2215/CJN.11951113. 24721885.
12. Choi SY, Suh KS, Choi DE, Lim BJ. 2010;Morphometric analysis of podocyte foot process effacement in IgA nephropathy and its association with proteinuria. Ultrastruct Pathol 34:195–198. 10.3109/01913121003648402. 20594038.
13. Cattran DC, Coppo R, et al. Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. 2009;The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int 76:534–545. 10.1038/ki.2009.243. 19571791.
14. Roberts IS, Cook HT, et al. Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. 2009;The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int 76:546–556. 10.1038/ki.2009.342. 19571790.
15. Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DC, et al. IgAN Classification Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. Conference Participants. 2017;Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group. Kidney Int 91:1014–1021. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003. 28341274.
16. Liang M, Zhang X, Zhou J, et al. 2016;Clinicopathological characteristics and renal outcomes in IgA nephropathy patients with nephrotic range proteinuria. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 9:4531–4538.
17. Kremers WK, Denic A, Lieske JC, et al. 2015;Distinguishing age-related from disease-related glomerulosclerosis on kidney biopsy: the Aging Kidney Anatomy study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30:2034–2039. 10.1093/ndt/gfv072. 25888387. PMC4783459.
18. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). 2009;A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. 19414839.
19. Perico L, Conti S, Benigni A, Remuzzi G. 2016;Podocyte-actin dynamics in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 12:692–710. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.127. 27573725. PMC7509435.
20. Alamartine E, Sauron C, Laurent B, Sury A, Seffert A, Mariat C. 2011;The use of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy to predict renal survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:2384–2388. 10.2215/CJN.01170211. 21885791. PMC3359557.
21. Herzenberg AM, Fogo AB, Reich HN, et al. 2011;Validation of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int 80:310–317. 10.1038/ki.2011.126. 21544062.
22. Shi SF, Wang SX, Jiang L, et al. 2011;Pathologic predictors of renal outcome and therapeutic efficacy in IgA nephropathy: validation of the oxford classification. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:2175–2184. 10.2215/CJN.11521210. 21852672. PMC3358999.
23. Chakera A, MacEwen C, Bellur SS, Chompuk LO, Lunn D, Roberts ISD. 2016;Prognostic value of endocapillary hypercellularity in IgA nephropathy patients with no immunosuppression. J Nephrol 29:367–375. 10.1007/s40620-015-0227-8. 26318019. PMC6511170.
24. Peng W, Tang Y, Tan L, Qin W. 2019;Crescents and global glomerulosclerosis in Chinese IgA nephropathy patients: a five-year follow-up. Kidney Blood Press Res 44:103–112. 10.1159/000498874. 30808856.
25. Soares MF, Genitsch V, Chakera A, et al. 2019;Relationship between renal CD68+ infiltrates and the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy. Histopathology 74:629–637. 10.1111/his.13768. 30303541.
26. Jennette JC. 2003;Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 63:1164–1177. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00843.x. 12631105.
27. Singh SK, Jeansson M, Quaggin SE. 2011;New insights into the pathogenesis of cellular crescents. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 20:258–262. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32834583ec. 21455064.
28. Suzuki H, Kiryluk K, Novak J, et al. 2011;The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:1795–1803. 10.1681/ASN.2011050464. 21949093.
29. Floege J, Moura IC, Daha MR. 2014;New insights into the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Semin Immunopathol 36:431–442. 10.1007/s00281-013-0411-7. 24442210. PMC5861174.
30. Kriz W, Shirato I, Nagata M, LeHir M, Lemley KV. 2013;The podocyte's response to stress: the enigma of foot process effacement. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 304:F333–F347. 10.1152/ajprenal.00478.2012. 23235479.
31. Lemley KV, Lafayette RA, Safai M, et al. 2002;Podocytopenia and disease severity in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int 61:1475–1485. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00269.x. 11918755.
32. Hill GS, Karoui KE, Karras A, et al. 2011;Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis plays a major role in the progression of IgA nephropathy. I. Immunohistochemical studies. Kidney Int 79:635–642. 10.1038/ki.2010.466. 21160460.
33. El Karoui K, Hill GS, Karras A, et al. 2011;Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis plays a major role in the progression of IgA nephropathy. II. Light microscopic and clinical studies. Kidney Int 79:643–654. 10.1038/ki.2010.460. 21178978.
34. Bellur SS, Troyanov S, Cook HT, Roberts IS. Working Group of International IgA Nephropathy Network and Renal Pathology Society. 2011;Immunostaining findings in IgA nephropathy: correlation with histology and clinical outcome in the Oxford classification patient cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2533–2536. 10.1093/ndt/gfq812. 21273233.
35. Shin DH, Lim BJ, Han IM, et al. 2016;Glomerular IgG deposition predicts renal outcome in patients with IgA nephropathy. Mod Pathol 29:743–752. 10.1038/modpathol.2016.77. 27102346.
36. Wada Y, Ogata H, Takeshige Y, et al. 2013;Clinical significance of IgG deposition in the glomerular mesangial area in patients with IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol 17:73–82. 10.1007/s10157-012-0660-0. 22752397.
37. Knoppova B, Reily C, Maillard N, et al. 2016;The origin and activities of IgA1-containing immune complexes in IgA nephropathy. Front Immunol 7:117. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00117. 27148252. PMC4828451.
38. Rizk DV, Saha MK, Hall S, et al. 2019;Glomerular immunodeposits of patients with IgA nephropathy are enriched for IgG autoantibodies specific for galactose-deficient IgA1. J Am Soc Nephrol 30:2017–2026. 10.1681/ASN.2018111156. 31444275. PMC6779349.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Representative histology by light microscopy of glomeruli with (A) mesangial hypercellularity and (B) endocapillary hypercellularity.

Black bar represents 50 μm; black arrowheads, mesangial hypercellularity; black arrows, endocapillary hypercellularity.

Figure 2

Representative images of electron microscopy of (A) rare, (B) mild, (C) moderate, and (D) diffuse foot process effacement.

White bar represents 5 μm in (A), (B), and (C) but 10 μm in (D). Black arrows represent lesion with foot process effacement.

Figure 3

Characteristics of renal histology according to stratification of severity of foot process effacement.

Represented based on (A-C) immunofluorescence stain, (A) IgA, (B) IgG, (C), C3, and (D) globally sclerotic glomeruli (GSG) abnormal or normal for age. The numbers in the graph indicate the numbers of patients. Statistical significance in trend test; aP < 0.01; bP < 0.05.

Figure 4

Degree of proteinuria based on the Oxford classification.

(A) Mesangial hypercellularity, M; (B) endocapillary hypercellularity, E; (C) segmental glomerulosclerosis, S; (D) tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, T; and (E) crescents, C. Presented as median and interquartile range; *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

Figure 5

The association of endocapillary hypercellularity and crescents and their implications on proteinuria.

(A) Crescents are more prevalent in endocapillary hypercellularity, P < 0.001 by Pearson’s chi-square test. (B) The amount of proteinuria is larger in endocapillary hypercellularity, irrespective of crescents. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

C, crescents; E, endocapillary hypercellularity.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with IgA nephropathy stratified according to foot process effacement (n = 245)

Characteristic Rare FPE (n = 46) Mild FPE (n = 111) Moderate FPE (n = 67) Diffuse FPE (n = 21) P value
Age (yr) 33 (23-49) 38 (30-48) 40 (31-46) 39 (31-49) 0.655
Male 30 (65.2) 64 (57.7) 36 (53.7) 13 (61.9) 0.656
HTN 14 (30.4) 33 (29.7) 22 (32.8) 8 (38.1) 0.664
Current smoker 9 (19.6) 20 (18.0) 9 (13.4) 3 (14.3) 0.799
BMI (kg/m2) 24.0 (21.2-26.7) 23.8 (21.0-26.4) 23.2 (21.5-26.4) 23.1 (21.4-26.5) 0.870
MAP (mmHg) 89 (76-97) 93 (83-97) 93 (83-97) 93 (82-107) 0.403
WBC count (/μL) 7,105 (5,933-8,165) 6,710 (5,820-8,120) 7,080 (5,590-8,720) 6,640 (5,630-8,405) 0.823
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13.8 ± 1.6 13.7 ± 1.6 13.5 ± 1.8 12.8 ± 2.6 0.118a
Platelet count (/μL) 264 (233-289) 251 (213-291) 245 (217-284) 224 (200-262) 0.122
Protein (g/dL) 6.9 (6.5-7.2) 6.8 (6.3-7.2) 6.7 (6.2-7.2) 6.1 (4.8-6.9) 0.002b
Albumin (g/dL) 4.2 (4.0-4.4) 4.2 (3.9-4.4) 4.1 (3.8-4.3) 3.7 (2.5-4.3) 0.005b
BUN (mg/dL) 13.8 (11.1-16.1) 14.5 (12.6-17.8) 15.7 (12.2-19.3) 16.7 (12.3-27.5) 0.064b
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.84 (0.70-0.99) 0.87 (0.70-1.10) 1.00 (0.80-1.20) 1.20 (0.85-1.70) < 0.001b
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) 103.5 (93.2-123.4) 108.0 (77.8-122.3) 88.4 (64.5-112.6) 71.1 (37.2-107.9) < 0.001b
Uric acid (mg/dL) 5.8 (4.4-6.5) 5.7 (4.8-6.6) 6.2 (4.6-7.4) 7.0 (5.7-9.1) 0.008b
Calcium (mg/dL) 9.3 (9.2-9.6) 9.2 (8.8-9.4) 9.1 (8.7-9.5) 8.6 (7.9-9.1) < 0.001
Corrected calcium (mg/dL) 9.1 ± 0.3 9.0 ± 0.4 9.0 ± 0.5 8.9 ± 0.5 0.256
Phosphorus (mg/dL) 3.5 ± 0.5 3.6 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.8 0.218
Urine protein (g/day) 0.38 (0.16-0.70) 0.60 (0.35-1.25) 0.60 (0.33-1.45) 0.74 (0.38-2.70) 0.003b
PCR (g/g) 0.30 (0.15-0.52) 0.55 (0.28-1.13) 0.58 (0.34-1.12) 1.22 (0.29-2.21) < 0.001b
Total glomeruli (counts) 32 (18-42) 23 (16-35) 22 (13-34) 22 (14-26) 0.038b
Glomerulosclerosis (%) 5.9 (0.0-16.3) 8.7 (1.3-23.1) 18.8 (6.7-42.1) 16.2 (5.2-33.7) < 0.001b
GSG abnormal for age 17 (37.0) 51 (45.9) 45 (67.2) 11 (52.4) 0.008b
Oxford classification
M1 14 (30.4) 49 (44.1) 44 (65.7) 11 (52.4) 0.002b
E1 23 (50.0) 52 (46.8) 35 (52.2) 11 (52.4) 0.899
S1 34 (73.9) 94 (84.7) 57 (85.1) 16 (76.2) 0.321
T1 4 (8.7) 25 (22.5) 19 (28.4) 6 (28.6) 0.009b,c
T2 0 (0.0) 2 (1.8) 6 (9.0) 0 (0.0)
C1 13 (28.3) 37 (33.3) 23 (34.3) 3 (14.3) 0.280c
C2 1 (2.2) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.8)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (%) as appropriate.

BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; C, crescents; E, endocapillary hypercellularity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FPE, foot process effacement; GSG, globally sclerotic glomeruli; HTN, hypertension; M, mesangial hypercellularity; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PCR, urine protein to creatinine ratio; S, segmental glomerulosclerosis; T, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis; WBC, white blood cell.

aP value was calculated using one-way ANOVA. In other cases, it was calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. bStatistical significance in the trend test. For continuous variables, the Jonckheere–Terpstra test was used. For categorical variables, Cochran–Armitage (only for 2 × k tables) or linear-by-linear test was used. cFisher’s exact test was used.

Table 2

The clinical and histologic characteristics associated with level of urine protein (g/day)

Variable Model 1 Model 2


β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value
Age, per 10 years -0.04 (-0.19 to 0.12) 0.655 -0.03 (-0.18 to 0.12) 0.713
Male 0.20 (-0.19 to 0.60) 0.312 0.26 (-0.12 to 0.64) 0.185
HTN -0.08 (-0.49 to 0.32) 0.689 0.01 (-0.39 to 0.40) 0.977
Current smoker 0.10 (-0.34 to 0.54) 0.651 0.13 (-0.29 to 0.56) 0.544
BMI, per 1 kg/m2 0.04 (-0.00 to 0.09) 0.058 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09) 0.023
MAP, per 1 mmHg 0.02 (0.00 to 0.03) 0.011 0.01 (0.00 to 0.03) 0.032
eGFR, per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 -0.12 (-0.21 to -0.03) 0.009 -0.09 (-0.18 to 0.00) 0.052
Uric acid, per mg/dL -0.04 (-0.16 to 0.09) 0.545 -0.07 (-0.19 to 0.05) 0.271
Oxford classification
M1 (vs. M0) 0.09 (-0.25 to 0.43) 0.621 0.04 (-0.29 to 0.38) 0.799
E1 (vs. E0) 0.51 (0.16 to 0.87) 0.004 0.53 (0.19 to 0.87) 0.002
S1 (vs. S0) -0.38 (-0.82 to 0.05) 0.084 -0.40 (-0.82 to 0.03) 0.067
T1/2 (vs. T0) -0.02 (-0.48 to 0.44) 0.942 0.03 (-0.43 to 0.48) 0.912
C1/2 (vs. C0) 0.08 (-0.31 to 0.46) 0.690 0.14 (-0.23 to 0.52) 0.457
Foot process effacement
Rare Reference
Mild 0.47 (0.05 to 0.89) 0.028
Moderate 0.50 (0.02 to 0.97) 0.042
Diffuse 1.30 (0.63 to 1.96) < 0.001

Multivariable generalized linear model was used (n = 245).

BMI, body mass index; C, crescents; CI, confidence interval; E, endocapillary hypercellularity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HTN, hypertension; M, mesangial hypercellularity; MAP, mean arterial pressure; S, segmental glomerulosclerosis; T, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis.

Table 3

The histologic characteristics associated with severity of foot process effacement

Variable Odds ratios (95% CI) P value
Oxford classification
M1 (vs. M0) 1.90 (1.10-3.26) 0.021
E1 (vs. E0) 1.16 (0.68-2.00) 0.586
S1 (vs. S0) 1.10 (0.55-2.20) 0.781
T1/2 (vs. T0) 1.79 (0.96-3.34) 0.065
C1/2 (vs. C0) 0.68 (0.38-1.23) 0.206
Immunofluorescence
IgA
1+ Reference
2+ 0.90 (0.49-1.65) 0.737
≥ 3+ 0.52 (0.20-1.32) 0.170
IgG
Negative Reference
Positive 3.77 (1.66-8.54) 0.001
C3
Negative Reference
Trace 2.09 (0.26-16.94) 0.489
1+ 0.88 (0.13-6.21) 0.901
≥ 2+ 1.12 (0.14-8.79) 0.912
Age-adjusted glomerulosclerosis
GSG normal for age Reference
GSG abnormal for age 1.57 (0.89-2.79) 0.122

Multivariable ordinary logistic analysis was used (n = 245).

C, crescents; CI, confidence interval; E, endocapillary hypercellularity; GSG, globally sclerotic glomeruli; M, mesangial hypercellularity; S, segmental glomerulosclerosis; T, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis.