Successful diagnosis and treatment of recurrent atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome posttransplantation caused by the heterozygous deletion of CFH in a patient with end-stage kidney disease of uncertain etiology

Article information

Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2024;43(1):125-129
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 January 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.23.197
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4Transplantation Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
6Department of Hospital Pathology, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
7Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: Byung Ha Chung Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea. E-mail: chungbh@catholic.ac.kr
Myungshin Kim Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo‑daero, Seocho‑gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea. E-mail: microkim@catholic.ac.kr
*Haeun Lee and Hoon Seok Kim contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.†Myungshin Kim and Byung Ha Chung are co-corresponding authors.
Received 2023 July 27; Accepted 2023 November 10.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease caused by the dysregulation of the alternative pathway of the complement system, leading to microvascular damage. It is a type of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by non-immune hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal impairment. Half of the patients with aHUS develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [1]. Genetic testing is crucial for the diagnosis of aHUS, as variants in complement regulatory protein gene significantly increase disease risk. Advances in genetic testing and its widespread use have revealed cases of aHUS recurring after kidney transplantation (KT) [2]. Herein, we present a case of recurrent aHUS after deceased-donor KT (DDKT) in a patient with ESKD of uncertain etiology. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (No. KC22ZISI0823).

A 45-year-old man with ESKD of uncertain etiology presented with allograft dysfunction 1 month after DDKT. The patient was on triple immunosuppressive therapy, including tacrolimus (trough level, 11.5 ng/mL). On admission, serum creatinine level was 2.7 mg/dL (baseline level, 1.4 mg/dL). Laboratory tests revealed Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia with decreased complement levels. Schistocytes on a peripheral blood smear test enabled a presumptive diagnosis of TMA. However, allograft biopsy (Fig. 1BD) revealed focally proliferative glomerulonephritis without pathological findings of TMA on light microscopy and bright glomerular C3 staining on immunofluorescence microscopy. Meanwhile, electron microscopy revealed segmentally thickened capillary basement membranes with subendothelial widening, indicating possibly early TMA. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) activity was 63.6%, and the Shiga toxin test result was negative. Despite seven sessions of plasma exchange, the patient’s allograft function did not recover, necessitating subsequent hemodialysis (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Patient’s clinical timeline and biopsy results.

(A) Timeline of the patient’s clinical course and laboratory findings. (B) Light microscopy on allograft kidney (H&E, ×400). Focally proliferative glomerulonephritis with many neutrophils in capillary loops (arrow). (C) Positive immunofluorescence for C3 showing a diffuse, fine granular pattern of the glomerular basement membrane in allograft kidney. (D) Electron microscopy on allograft kidney. Segmentally thickened capillary basement membranes with endothelial damage and subendothelial widening (arrows). (E) Light microscopy on native kidney (trichrome, ×400). Occluded arteriolar lumen with thrombosis and intimal edema (arrows).

CMV, cytomegalovirus; HD, hemodialysis; HPF, high-power field; KT, kidney transplantation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PLT, platelet; SCr, serum creatinine.

In differentially diagnosing primary aHUS, we performed clinical exome sequencing and discovered a novel heterozygous missense variant (NM_000204.4: c.119A>C, p.His40Pro) of CFI gene (Fig. 2A). Subsequently, the variant was confirmed to originate from the father by direct sequencing of the trio samples (Fig. 2B) and was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), according to the guideline [3]. Additionally, we employed multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to examine copy number variations in CFH and CFH-related genes, and found a pathogenic heterozygous deletion in exon 22 and its downstream region in CFH (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, we found arteriolar thrombotic occlusion upon review of his native kidney biopsy (Fig. 1E). Finally, aHUS was identified as the cause of ESKD and allograft dysfunction. The patient underwent hemodialysis for 4 weeks before completing a 4-week induction with eculizumab (1,200 mg/week). After induction, the patient successfully terminated hemodialysis and, with continued eculizumab therapy (900 mg every 2 weeks), hemolysis resolved and allograft function steadily improved (Fig. 1A).

Figure 2.

Results of the genetic evaluation.

(A) The clinical exome sequencing result viewed in the Integrative Genome Viewer. A novel heterozygous missense variant, NM_000204.4: c.119A>C, p.His40Pro, is observed in CFI. (B) Results of the direct Sanger sequencing for the patient and his parents. The father is confirmed to carry the same CFI variant. (C) Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification shows a heterozygous deletion of exon 22 and its downstream in CFH.

Recent registry data [4] have shown that up to 20% of KT recipients have ESKD of uncertain etiology. Groopman et el. [5] conducted whole-exome sequencing for 3,315 patients with chronic kidney disease and identified diagnostic variants in 307 patients (9.3%). Ten variants were associated with TMA; however, none were clinically diagnosed with TMA before genetic evaluation. This suggests that aHUS may be underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed in patients with ESKD.

The main pathological features of TMA are arteriolar and capillary thrombosis with characteristic abnormalities in the endothelium and vessel wall [1]. However, unlike typical hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, aHUS biopsies rarely show thrombi [6]. Herein, no prominent vascular thrombosis was observed under light microscopy; however, electron microscopy revealed endothelial damage, indicating early-stage disease and the potential for allograft salvage.

We identified a novel missense CFI variant, c.119A>C. However, the patient’s clinical course was more severe than that expected for a CFI VUS carrier. Techniques such as MLPA allow the identification of CFH/CFH-related 1 (CFH/CFHR1) hybrid alleles, which are undetectable by sequencing and present in approximately 3%–5% of all aHUS cases [7]. Using MLPA, we discovered a partial deletion of CFH, predisposing the patient to aHUS. However, the locations of other CFHR deletions could not be identified; therefore, it was difficult to determine which CFH/CFHR hybrid was generated, which requires further research.

Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-C5 antibody, is a well-documented therapeutic agent for aHUS. Eculizumab prophylaxis significantly reduces recurrence rates and its timely use improves allograft survival in patients with recurrent aHUS [8]. However, the optimal duration for its maintenance remains inconclusive [8]. As the prognosis of aHUS is highly dependent on genetic variants, individualized risk stratification based on the genetic background may be necessary to determine appropriate treatment durations. As our patient harbors a CFH variant belonging to the high-risk variant [8], treatment discontinuation should be approached with utmost caution.

In summary, we report a case of aHUS that was overlooked in a patient carrying a heterozygous deletion of CFH until recurrence occurred post-DDKT. This report emphasizes the importance of primary kidney disease evaluation and careful monitoring for TMA, especially in patients with ESKD of uncertain etiology. Genetic testing is crucial for aHUS diagnosis, regardless of typical TMA features in pathology. Prompt initiation of eculizumab can prevent allograft failure.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI22C1529), and by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00209312).

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Haeun Lee, HSK, Hanbi Lee

Data curation: Haeun Lee, HSK, SHE, IOS, JS

Visualization: Haeun Lee, HSK, JS

Writing-original first draft: Haeun Lee, HSK

Writing-review & editing: YJC, CWY, MK, BHC

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hayoung Lee for designing Fig. 1A.

References

1. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1676–1687.
2. Alasfar S, Alachkar N. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome post-kidney transplantation: two case reports and review of the literature. Front Med (Lausanne) 2014;1:52.
3. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–424.
4. Jeon HJ, Koo TY, Ju MK, et al. The Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY): an overview and summary of the kidney-transplant cohort. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:492–507.
5. Groopman EE, Marasa M, Cameron-Christie S, et al. Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing for kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2019;380:142–151.
6. Kim YJ. A new pathological perspective on thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:524–532.
7. Venables JP, Strain L, Routledge D, et al. Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with a hybrid complement gene. PLoS Med 2006;3e431.
8. Zuber J, Frimat M, Caillard S, et al. Use of highly individualized complement blockade has revolutionized clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation and renal epidemiology of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019;30:2449–2463.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Patient’s clinical timeline and biopsy results.

(A) Timeline of the patient’s clinical course and laboratory findings. (B) Light microscopy on allograft kidney (H&E, ×400). Focally proliferative glomerulonephritis with many neutrophils in capillary loops (arrow). (C) Positive immunofluorescence for C3 showing a diffuse, fine granular pattern of the glomerular basement membrane in allograft kidney. (D) Electron microscopy on allograft kidney. Segmentally thickened capillary basement membranes with endothelial damage and subendothelial widening (arrows). (E) Light microscopy on native kidney (trichrome, ×400). Occluded arteriolar lumen with thrombosis and intimal edema (arrows).

CMV, cytomegalovirus; HD, hemodialysis; HPF, high-power field; KT, kidney transplantation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PLT, platelet; SCr, serum creatinine.

Figure 2.

Results of the genetic evaluation.

(A) The clinical exome sequencing result viewed in the Integrative Genome Viewer. A novel heterozygous missense variant, NM_000204.4: c.119A>C, p.His40Pro, is observed in CFI. (B) Results of the direct Sanger sequencing for the patient and his parents. The father is confirmed to carry the same CFI variant. (C) Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification shows a heterozygous deletion of exon 22 and its downstream in CFH.